WELCOME - October 2019 Newsletter

What will a good new arrangement look like?

There has been welcome clarification of the position Joint Targeted Area Inspections (JTAI) will take in respect of MASA, (see the item below). This includes a commitment to aggregate findings from the 10 JTAI’S undertaken each year. Inspections have alway been an important, though of course selectively focused form of feedback, and have in recent years made a significant contribution to how we understand and form a view about effective safeguarding partnerships.This feedback has sat well alongside the efforts of others (including AILC) to embrace the challenge of providing some key reference points across a locally and nationally focused landscape. 

The continued contribution  from inspection will be helpful, but is unlikely to provide as sharp focus and driver as it previously did. This may be no bad thing, but raises a challenge as to how we can build on and arrive at a set of consistent measures for and ways of evaluating the effectiveness and contribution safeguarding partnership arrangements can make.

Under the new arrangements, statutory partners will most likely pay attention to the balance between what good looks like in terms of how this is judged against statutory functions, wider whole system considerations and activities that partnerships undertake. It remains to be seen how the new flexibilities, and therefore differences in choices and approaches, will impact on and require us to further consider how and perhaps the value of meaningful comparisons are arrived at.

The continued focus of inspection on effective leadership is also welcome, and it is interesting to note that many (perhaps in excess of 50%) of partnerships have chosen to incorporate a dedicated independent role. It will be important to better understand the different types of roles people are deploying and the relationship these have with the leadership arrangements and those for achieving effective “scrutiny”. Whilst some have retained the term and presumably some aspects of the role of “chair”, we know that others have not included this element. 

There can be a tendency to form a view of arrangements on the basis of a misunderstanding that new roles are simply a continuation of a role that is no longer a requirement. It will take some time to review and understand the differences that are emerging as a result of the new freedoms to determine local choices, in terms of how the new tripartite leadership arrangements and different approaches to “scrutiny” incorporate “independent type roles”. 

Successful partnership arrangements often have a strong narrative as well as well directed activity as to how they see the context for local joint working, and how this results in positive outcomes for vulnerable children and young people. 

TASP is firmly committed to providing a place and a space where all concerned can share and draw on their experiences, in order to both identify common ground and to ensure that there remains an evidence based focus on “what works well and what good looks like” in the context of safeguarding partnerships.



Welcome to our Newest Members

  • Harrow
  • Hammersmith & Fulham, Kensington & Chelsea, Westminster
  • Guernsey
  • Wakefield
  • Somerset

Website News

Currently we are still running our website through the Association of Independent LSCB Chairs site, but we are designing and building a separate website for TASP. We will announce a launch date as soon as possible. In the meantime, we have added two new pages for Police and Health, under our USEFUL RESOURCES section. These will be used to promote any content or materials that Police and Health wish to promote to our network.

Please note, our Vacancy pages are still very much in use and regularly have Independent Scrutineer posts advertised. In fact, it is reported as a strong driver for Partnerships, particularly as they are establishing new posts. If you are not currently a member, and wish to advertise, it is worth noting that this is a FREE service ot our members. Advertising is £650.00 for non-members. To view our Vacancy pages click here.

Subscription and Membership

For 2019 – 2020 the fee for joining remains at £1500 for partnerships focused on a single Local Authority area. We will be consulting with members and others during the next few months as to the future cost of membership from April 2020.

In part because we want to reflect some of the differentials that can apply, such as partnerships that cover a number of areas, or have a national focus. It is right that we should both seek to reflect some of the economies of scale that some of these partnerships seek to reflect, as well as trying to make sure that benefits are fairly accessed.

Therefore for we have introduced the following scale as a guide, for partnerships that may meet the criteria.

The baseline offer of five representatives who benefit directly from conference and event discounts, early booking and priority website access to dedicated resources, is based on the three Statutory Partners, a Business Manager role and an Independent type role. As there appears to be a number of other combinations in terms of partnerships and we are also welcoming membership from other organisations the above represents a guide and a basis of negotiation.

up to 5 representatives     =     £1500 (equivalent to £300 pp)
up to 10 representatives   =     £2500 (equivalent to £250 pp)
up to 15 representatives   =     £3375 (equivalent to £225 per person)
up to 20 representatives   =     £4000 (equivalent to £200 per person)
up to 25 representatives   =     £4375 (equivalent to £175 per person)

Any additional above 25 @ £50.00 per additional representative

We welcome any feedback on these rates, and any other suggestions you may have as this will help inform decisions about the future fee arrangements from April next year. Please forward these to Alison at manager@lscbchairs.org.uk.

Survey Update

We have recently issued a survey asking our members to give some feedback on services. We would really appreciate Membership feedback, so if you haven't had a chance to complete it yet, we welcome your participation! We will publish summary results in November/December.

Advisory Group

After the success of our first Advisory Group meeting, another has been arranged for 4th November 2019 - 10.00 via telephone conference. So please, if you have any free time, do let us know if you would like to join us at this meeting. Contact frankie.good@lscbchairs.org.uk and let her know.

Conference News

After discussion with our advisory group we are working towards a two day conference in June 2020. We think this will be a good time for people to come together to share and look at progress, emerging learning and common issues and opportunities. More news shortly!

News from our Statutory Safeguarding Partners – Health, Police & Local Authorities

As mentioned, we have added Police and Health news to our website now and this month we have the NHS newsletter for Safeguarding Partnerships: 

In this issue the following is covered:

  • Facilitator Update
  • The National Picture
  • Sarah Elliott from the National Panel shares her perspective on Child Safeguarding Practice Reviews & Rapid Reviews
  • Serious Child Safeguarding Incident Notifications

Click here for Health and here for Police.

We hope to include news, shortly, from the Local Authority perspective.


We welcome enquires about joining us, remember though we are presently mainly focused on statutory arrangements for children and young people, membership is open to any organisation that has a focus on safeguarding and partnership approaches.


Cross Partnership Collaboration and Support

One important characteristic of the former LSCB arrangements were “regional” arrangements. Based on a long gone configuration of central government support at a regional level, mainly focused on LA’s Business Managers and Chairs, these met regularly to share good practice, offer peer support and work towards consistency across a wider footprint.

The former AILC worked closely with these networks ensuring that a director was elected from each region. AILC worked with and sough to support, each network, however these usually reflected local interests, and were not per se AILC arrangements. It is fair to say, and something to celebrate, that in most places these flourished, resulting in some sharing of arrangements, coordinated training and awareness raising as well as a focus on the underpinnings of effective partnerships. There were differences in focus and impact, and for some areas the challenge of geography was an issue.

In the new world of safeguarding partnerships, we understand that in some “regions” people are maintaining their previous arrangements for networking. In other areas new arrangements represent in themselves a closer collaboration between partners and footprint and might suggest a move away from the previous understanding of “regional”.

We know that the East of England, Yorkshire and Humber are maintaining their meetings and would be interested to hear about others. We are also happy to share news from them.

There can be no doubt, that especially for business managers the opportunity to share practice and access peer support is important, and although it is early days, the opportunity for others who now hold a variety of independent type roles to meet and share may well be important.

TASP will, once its governance arrangements are fully established, consult closely with members in relation to how it might support and draw on any continuation and development of locally focused peer support and sharing arrangements for those roles that underpin the new arrangements.

Please contact Frankie about where you are in your own areas, and any thoughts you have.



 We regularly receive and scan for information and news that we think will be helpful for partnerships. You can often find further information on the website and we will try to signpost this whenever we can. The things we include in the newsletter are guided by direct relavance, topicality and contributions and suggestions from members and TASP supporters. Inclusion and any commentary should not be seen as a direct endorsement but rather to help you have a look and make up your own minds.

 Ofsted, HMICFRS, CQC and HMI Probation

JTAIs and the New MASA Arrangements

Ofsted, Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary, Fire and Rescue Services, the Care Quality Commission (CQC) and HMI Probation jointly inspect and report on the impact of local multi-agency safeguarding arrangements on children through the joint targeted area inspection (JTAI) programme. There are up to ten JTAIs per year. These joint inspections look closely at the experiences of children and provide a rigorous assessment of the quality and impact of work in a local area. The inspectorates identify strengths and weaknesses in the practice of individual agencies: the local authority, health agencies, the police, the youth offending team, the National Probation Service and the Community Rehabilitation Companies, as well as the collective response to children.

We do not intend to amend our methodology now that the new multi-agency safeguarding arrangements (MASA) are in place. The inspectorates focus on how well leaders work together to tackle the issue identified in that specific deep dive e.g. Exploitation, domestic abuse, mental health will continue to look at how strategic arrangements help or hinder practice. We do not endorse a particular model but where there is a strength or a weakness that impacts on practice with children we will report on it. We intend to aggregate any findings about MASA. We hope that the findings from the JTAI inspections and the overview reports will provide helpful pointers to MASAs whatever their structure. The structure of MASA arrangements may influence our choice of local areas if it is pertinent to the ‘deep dive’ theme.

 DfE and Department for Health and Social Care

  First “State of the Nation” Report marks World Mental Health Day and is the first of its kind from the government and provides helpful insight into how we can better understand “wellbeing” and also information Friendship, school and a good night’s sleep have all been named as key factors in a young person’s happiness.

 National Children's Bureau

The NCB have published their final report from the Early Adopters programme. It combines the results of their survey, interviews, and other knowledge shared over the course of the programme.

Some of the highlights are that:
  • Changes to the statutory framework present a range of opportunities for innovation and improvement in local safeguarding arrangements
  • In the short-term it may be necessary to focus on a limited range of improvements in implementation, but this should be part of a gradual longer term transformation plan towards improving outcomes for children and young people
  • Attention should be paid to ensuring leaders in local authorities, police and health come together in equal partnership and also how partners engage other relevant agencies, including school leaders
  • An agreed vision should be ambitious in terms of outcomes for children
  • Collaboration across areas where there are shared priorities can allow for streamlined processes, the sharing of intelligence and may reduce duplication for the benefit of practitioners, children and young people, and their families
  • Methods of scrutinising practice should be integrated throughout safeguarding arrangements
  • A learning culture should be embedded into safeguarding arrangements and plans should adapt over time to emerging lessons.

You can download the report here

 Children's Commissioner for England 

 Childhood Vulnerability in Numbers

Need, Spend, and the Millions of Children in England Who Miss Out’ report is an info graphic and includes detailed information on the spending allocated to vulnerable children, and includes:
  • In a typical class of 30, six children are growing up at risk due to family circumstances
  • 829,000 out of 2.3 million children are at risk due to family circumstances that are invisible to children's services
  • Spending per head on pre-statutory support is £900

You may have seen this information before, but it is worth a look just for the info graphics which will most likely help partnerships to set the context when considering vulnerability and the related issues around Children in Need, and the extent to which early help approaches embrace poverty, disadvantage, wellbeing and the cross over’s with public health agendas.

Gaming the System
93 percent of children in the UK play video games, yet despite its popularity, the culture of ‘gaming’- its rules and its rituals, the varying profiles of players, the risks they face – tends to be spoken of by adults, whether they be policymakers or parents, as if it were an alien landscape.

The widespread popularity of gaming and the evolution of gaming from offline to online have raised concerns, such as children being able to talk to strangers or becoming the target of bullying. Over-exposure to video game content may have a damaging effect on the development and socialisation of young people.

A growing concern is the potential for children to be negatively affected by violent imagery and other inappropriate content. We spoke to children aged 10 to 16 to better understand what they love and what they dislike about gaming and how gaming could be improved for them.

We know that it can be difficult to keep and catch up with how children and young people experience the “virtual” parts of their lives. This report helps us to better understand how it works from a young persons’ perspective. Interestingly, it raises an important question as to why many games that involve payment, are not classed as gambling, and if they were, then this might change our approach?



Parent and Carer’s Views on Preventing Sexual Abuse
Published in September, this short research report will help with Partnership approaches to,  and understanding of, what can be important in protecting disabled children from sexual abuse. Further research updates which you might find useful here, at the NSPCC Learning Library.

Research is important but can be a bit daunting – however we do find it useful to check out their website here.

 Articles about the new arrangements


The LGA recently reported on the improvements being made through the "shake-up" of partnership arrangements. Download the article from our News page here. 

Children & Young People Now – Oct 2019
Streamlined System Marks New Era for Safeguarding Children

A new system of local and national reviews for safeguarding children practice was rolled out at the end of September, two-and-a-half years after a review called for “significant reform”. Sir Alan Wood’s review of the role and functions of local safeguarding children boards (LSCB) highlighted inconsistencies in the ways lessons were learned from serious case reviews (SCR) and raised concerns about how responsibility – and cost – for safeguarding work was co-ordinated between key agencies. Click here to reach our NEWS page and access the full article. We are very grateful to CYPN for allowing us to share this article. For further information on CYPN, click here.

Child Death Reviews

The National Child Safeguarding Practice Panel has announced a review into sudden unexpected infant death in families where the children are considered at risk of harm. Click here to see the letter sent by Edward Timpson.

Anti-Bullying Week
Anti-Bullying Alliance.  Anti-Bullying Week - 11th to 15th November 2019. Click here to see a really interesting video.

Childhood Trauma
As well as focusing on the forms abuse, neglect and exploitation takes and how this impacts on joint working responses in the present, many partnerships are also increasingly bringing into focus efforts and initiatives that potentially offer the opportunity to achieve wider shifts in how we reduce and prevent incidence. We are grateful to Norfolk SAB for sharing this article. Three Ways Childhood Trauma Affects Adulthood.

If you would like to share your approach to this and examples then please send these directly, to Frankie at frankie.good@lscbchairs.org.uk.



We would really welcome contributions, especially if you have a story you would like to share that others would benefit from. Drop us an email and we can discuss how to include this at chair@lscbchairs.org.uk.

Please phone the Association on 07880 209 788 if you would like any help at all, or email Frankie at frankie.good@lscbchairs.org.uk if you have queries or comments.

With best wishes,

Richard Burrows
AILC Chair

Association Phone 07880 209788
Follow us on Twitter @AssocLSCBChair





The 29th of September marks another significant step in the long history of the collective response to the challenges of coordinating joint working to safeguard children and young people. As yet our picture and understanding of what the new arrangements will look like is partial but is likely to emerge in due course.

It seems fitting that we should note and pay tribute to all those who have worked hard and been so committed to the former LSCB arrangements. For now, it seems that many are wanting to build on the many positive attributes of this legacy.

We should be in no doubt that the changes are significant and present opportunities to re-set and re-approach some of the essential characteristics and functions embodied in effective safeguarding partnerships, old and new.

Perspectives and levels of ownership will no doubt remain diverse, which emphasises the importance of a continued endeavour to find common ground, build the picture and respect the different ways partnerships will go about seeking to bring unity and a shared purpose to safeguarding activity, that is effective by any measure.

From what our members are telling us, some of the common themes and different approaches are starting to become clearer. It is to be welcomed that government, in so far as it is able to maintain its focus on safeguarding at present, has recognised that transitions will be gradual and that these will benefit from ongoing support. Likewise at a national level Statutory Partners are investing in bringing some focus to change, and it is hoped that this will continue after March of next year.

Support for TASP is promising, and membership will shape and support how priorities are set, within the remit of bringing a positive approach that values learning, recognises the importance of being able to share experience and help all to have a clear view of the principles that have served to ensure that our approach to safeguarding is of the highest standard.

Some of the emerging issues and themes such as the new leadership arrangements, the retention of partnerships outside of a formal “Board” model, different degrees of ambition in respect of whole or part system focus, new applications of “independence” and its relationship with scrutiny and other governance and operational aspects are probably not the only ones that will emerge.

To take this forward we have introduced a new “spotlight” section, this will provide the opportunity for stakeholders and members to suggest and share key issues and experience, which they feel will add to the shared task of setting the new landscape. This month we focus on the new DWP Reducing Conflict Programme, as some members felt raised a number of opportunities around strategic join up and the wider debate around prevention and safeguarding.

We also take a first look at “Independent scrutiny” and thanks to Jenny Pearce for sharing her thoughts and work on this.

It is important for us to say that in sharing information and perspectives, we include these on the basis of the contribution they may make to your own arrangements and forming a wider perspective, and therefore do not necessarily intend these to be reflective of our position. When this is the case we will try to be clear about this.

It is probably fair to observe that there are mixed views about how things will develop so some words from Abraham Lincoln may be helpful in embodying the efforts of all to form and forge ways in which partnerships can make a difference and build on the strengths of the past. “The best way to predict the future is to create it”

We hope that you will find this newsletter helpful, and in addition to commissioning future items we welcome any suggestions and or contributions.



New Members 

 A warm welcome to the last five members who have joined us; Calderdale, Durham, Luton, Surrey and Suffolk.

Members Survey

We will be circulating a brief online survey to our members to kick off consultation of the development of the future TASP offer and, what members feel should be priorities.


Open access will remain for all interested parties as we continue the process of migrating content to the archives and developing TASP focused content. It looks like we will either overhaul the present site, then launch a new hosting address, or commission a new site. We want to time this with the feedback from members, so your continued patience is appreciated.

Registration of TASP

We recently heard from the Charity Commission who are currently experiencing a significant backlog in dealing with new registrations, so as soon as we have news we will let you know.

Advisory Group

We held a very productive first Advisory Group Meeting and many thanks again, to all who volunteered to join, and to those who were also able to attend. We will be holding another meeting shortly and the thinking is, pending the establishment of the Board of Trustees and the appointment of the staff team, that it will be good to draw on the experience of those who are in the thick of it; this will help inform decisions and direction. So please, if you have any free time, do let us know if you could join this group. Contact at frankie.good@lscbchairs.org.uk to do so.

Membership Fees

For the year 2019/2020 we have set this at the same rate as the old AILC fee. However we do want to review this for 20/21 in consultation with members. For example whether in addition to the current model which is partnership focused and allocates 5 individual access/benefit packages, there is room for other types of membership. We are also aware that there are a number of partnerships that operate across a number of LA/CCG areas. So we are working on an interim solution to a fee for these types of arrangements that offers them some benefit from economies of scale, but also reflects the need to ensure a proportionate balance with the majority of partnerships that focus on one area and 3 statutory partners.

We welcome and encourage statutory partners and Business Managers to express interest and commitment by joining us now!

Please Contact Us or Join Us by phone on 07880 209 788 or email at frankie.good@lscbchairs.org.uk if you have queries or comments.


 Department of Works and Pensions "Reducing Parental Conflict" Programme

We were able to talk with Patrick Myers who leads on this programme and felt it would be helpful for members to hear from him.

I am really pleased to be given the opportunity to share with you the work that I am currently involved with at the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). I am an Assistant Director from Dorset Council Children’s Services Department seconded to work on the Government’s Reducing Parental Conflict programme. I want to share with you the aims of the Government’s work to reduce parental conflict, as well as the scale of the issue. Having been involved in the early pilot work with DWP and now the roll out of the national programme, I know that the programme has been built around strong evidence and as such should have a clear impact on family dynamics and improve children’s lives and outcomes.

Inter-parental conflict that is frequent, intense and poorly resolved is not good for children and can result in negative outcomes that can be felt across the life course. It can affect their early emotional and social development, their educational attainment and later employability - limiting their chances to lead fulfilling, happy lives. Our goal is to reduce conflict between parents, and we know that this is important whether a child’s parents are together or separated. We know that sometimes separation can be the best option for a couple, but even then, continued co-operation and communication between parents is better for their children.

Backed by up to £39m in funding, the Reducing Parental Conflict programme is encouraging councils and their partners across England to integrate evidence-based services and approaches to addressing parental conflict that work for their local families.

The Government has already announced plans to transform the way we think about and tackle domestic violence and abuse, while the focus of the Reducing Parental Conflict (RPC) Programme is on conflict considered to be below that threshold. Parental conflict can range from a lack of warmth and emotional distance, right through to swearing and shouting.

We know that this is a significant issue. Where a child lives with both parents in the same household, more than one in ten children have at least one parent who reports relationship distress. And children living in workless families are three times more likely to experience parental conflict than in families where both parents are in work.

The poor outcomes for children exposed to parental conflict can lead to increased pressure on public services, and yet we know that support to reduce parental conflict is not yet fully reflected in many of the local services offered to families. The RPC programme is looking to address and advise local provision.

Early pilot work with 12 local authorities has informed the various strands of the programme. There are four primary strands:

  • Funding to support strategic leadership across local authorities’ footprints to make effective plans with partners to address the issues related to inter parental conflict
  • Practitioner training across all 151 local authorities to equip frontline staff with skills and knowledge to help families where conflict is evident
  • Four areas (30 local authorities) piloting a range of interventions to reduce inter parental conflict with the express intention of improving children’s outcomes
  • Specialist training in those pilot interventions should they prove to be effective.

In addition, the DWP is collaborating with Public Health England and the Department for Health and Social Care on the Innovation Fund for Children of Alcohol Dependent Parents, which has provided nine areas with support to work in this challenging area. And our £2.2m RPC Challenge Fund is funding 10 innovative projects, to support families who face particular disadvantages, as well as digital support to reduce parental conflict. For further information, please contact me at patrick.myers@dwp.gov.uk.


It was interesting to learn more about the Department of Work & Pensions “Reducing Parental Conflict” programme which we feature in this newsletter. This, and other similar developments and approaches can have so much more value if they are embraced by partnerships who can promote the linkages between good and effective ideas and, the potential to apply learning so that it results in elements of system re design, changes in practice and building a more “curious workforce and joint working” as well as impacting on the many and varied service or organisational specific funding rewarded targets?

We think it will continue be important for each partnership to set the parameters of their aspirations, but there is growing evidence that many are recognising the opportunity to establish a shared view of the interconnectedness of the lives and worlds that children and their families experience which places a greater emphasis on “heading of at the pass” the things that can negatively impact on how children grow up and flourish.


 Other Safeguarding News


Departments of Education, Health and Social Care and the Home Office

The three Departments continue to work together to support the changes in safeguarding partnership arrangements, and are looking at the future role of Reform Board and Evaluations group. The former has involved external stakeholders and AILC has been able to contribute to discussions, as it has with the proposals to commission external evaluation.

The DfE Implementation Board for Child Safeguarding Reform have now gone live with the sector expert tender. This is for up to 60 days of work between 31 October 2019 and 31 March 2020. Click here to access the link. (Editors note – we know the closing date has past, but thought the information would be helpful and once an appointment is made we will feature this).

We are hopeful as TASP becomes established that there will continue to be a place at the table for the association, as we can uniquely draw on and channel learning and development from across member partnerships.

We understand that DfE officials are working their way through the plans, in order to inform their strategic assessment and to offer feedback to partnerships. This highlights the importance of being able to start to get a sense of directions of travel and details, and TASP is currently consulting its members as to how we might add to this picture. It would be good to hear from any partnership that has taken part in the DfE compliance exercise.

Sensibly there seems to be a recognition that changes will take time to implement, especially as so many of the plans recognise the importance of continuity and the potential significance of the changes. As the statutory partners work towards a clearer understanding of the commonalities and differences.

The National Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel – Children’s Serious Incidents Notification System

As you probably know, the online referral system for reviews went live in February and all areas must register to use it by 30 September 2019 - is your partnership signed up? Click here to access.

This will allow the notification to the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel if it’s known or suspected that a child has been abused or neglected.

This service should be used if:

  • a looked-after child dies including where abuse or neglect is not known or suspected
  • a child dies or is seriously harmed in the local authority’s area
  • a child dies or is seriously harmed outside England while normally resident in the local authority’s area

We are told that some authorities have not reported any cases meeting the serious incident threshold since 29 June 2018. Further analysis is taking place in the Department for Education to see whether any further action is necessary. The National Panel will report the findings from the first National Review in the Autumn.

We are in the process of arranging one of our regular meetings with Edward Timpson (Chair) and a panel member, so if there are issues that you feel we could raise please let us know.

National Police Chiefs Council (NPCC)

Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hub Conference 2019 - This will be the first NPCC Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hub (MASH) Conference to be held and it will provide much needed networking with experts from around the country and is not solely aimed at Police: if you feel that any of your local partners would like to attend please feel free to share this. This will be held on 1st – 2nd October 2019 and the location is the Crowne Plaza Hotel, Chester. Click here to access further information.

We are grateful for the support being shown by the NPCC in setting up TASP, along with that provided by the Department of Health and Social Care, through Loraine Parker (NPCC) and Liz Balfe (DHSC) who have dedicated roles until March 2020. We are sharing NPCC's newsletter which is also sharing resources. You can find it here.

NHS Improvement

NHS Improvement recently launched their new Patient Safety Strategy. Hopefully it will continue to build bridges re the necessary focus on clinical risk and a focus on safeguarding, and may be food for thought for safeguarding partnerships. Click here to access.

Safeguarding Research

The Independent Inquiry into CSA has commissioned the National Centre for Social Research and ResearchAbility (both independent research organisations) to carry out research into safeguarding practice in residential schools. The study explores awareness, understanding and experiences of safeguarding practice in relation to child sexual abuse among school staff, students and parents, as well as in local authorities, with the aim of sharing best practice as well as identifying areas for improvement. Researchers would like to speak to local authority staff as part of this research, and will contact the Director of Children’s Services in some local authorities in the coming weeks to invite individuals in their teams to participate. If you would like to find out more, please get in touch via email to residentialschools@natcen.ac.uk

Recent Tweet from Matthew Gibson

We can forget, in our efforts to rightly focus on positive outcomes for children and young people, seeing things through the eyes of practitioners - our approach to scrutiny and learning may not always look at things from this perspective?

Centre of Expertise on Child Sexual Abuse

Centre of Expertise on CSA have published the next paper in their Key messages from Research series, focusing on looked-after children and child sexual abuse.

They have also recently published Key Messages from Research on identifying and responding to disclosures of child sexual abuse.

Safeguarding in Faith Communities - NSPCC

The NSPCC has released the latest episode of its child protection podcast series. This week’s episode focuses on what safeguarding means to faith communities and groups.

The podcast discusses the important role faith communities play in children and young people’s lives, and covers topics including: why faith groups need to understand their safeguarding responsibilities; the challenges that safeguarding children and young people in faith communities brings; and how faith communities can develop a safeguarding culture that works alongside other cultural beliefs, values and customs. Click here to access.


Independent Scrutiny

A big thanks to Jenny Pearce for agreeing to share her recent work and thoughts on Independent Scrutiny. We know that along with other aspects of the new arrangements, there are different interpretations and approaches to this.
We welcome further contributions that can help add to our understanding of this and we would want to support a “healthy debate” so please tell us what you think and we will do our best to share this. Click here to access Jenny's report.


New Report from Children’s Commissioner

A report has been published showing new research on the thousands of children growing up in homeless families. The report, Bleak Houses: Tackling the Crisis of Family Homelessness in England. Bleak Houses, reveals the terrible reality of how some children are living in converted shipping containers, office blocks and B&Bs, in cramped conditions, often miles away from their schools.

The report shows that while official statistics show 120,000 children in England are living in temporary accommodation, this does not include the hidden homeless who are ‘sofa-surfing’, often in very cramped conditions. New analysis conducted for the Children’s Commissioner for England estimates that in 2016-2017 there were 90,000 children living in sofa-surfing families.

A Manifesto for Children – Children’s Commissioner

The manifesto, published ahead of any upcoming General Election, calls on Britain’s political parties to include a six-point plan in their election manifestos to transform the life chances for disadvantaged children and to help all of England’s 12 million children to thrive.

The manifesto sets out some of the key issues that children have told the Children’s Commissioner’s Office are affecting their lives, and reflects many of the subjects the Children’s Commissioner has been shining a light on in recent years – children growing up in chaotic families, inadequate children’s mental health services, children’s safety and children living in poor quality housing such as B&Bs, converted office blocks or shipping containers.

A Recent Tweet from Anne Longfield, Children’s Commissioner


For our next newsletter, we would welcome contributions, especially if you have a story you would like to share that others would benefit from. Drop us an email and we can discuss how to include this at chair@lscbchairs.org.uk.

Please phone the Association on 07880 209 788 if you would like any help at all, or email Frankie at frankie.good@lscbchairs.org.uk if you have queries or comments.

With best wishes,

Richard Burrows
AILC Chair

Association Phone 07880 209788
Follow us on Twitter @AssocLSCBChair