Website Help

This page is under construction and requires your feedback!  It is intended to be a service to members that require help using the website (in all its forms).  The intention is to build some simple instructions to do key tasks for members or users on the website.  If there is anything you would like help with, as well as contact us directly, please post ideas on how this help area may be developed to help you use our resources.  For direct help email Alison Thorpe

Website Help

Posted September 21, 2018 by Richard Burrows
   Click into the boxes below to create your post  
Name of Author  Richard Burrows
Job Title
 
Representing LSCB(s)  
Discussion

https://policypress.wordpress.com/2018/09/20/protecting-children-time-for-a-new-story/

Not yet read this but an important contribution to the necessary debate about how we glue together the mosaic that is (and always has been) joint working to protect children. Particularly relevant possibly in terms of the debates many are having about the long term impact and potential of MASH and new models for thresholds? 

 

0 replies
Posted September 6, 2018 by Richard Burrows
   Click into the boxes below to create your post  
Name of Author  Richard Burrows 
Job Title
 Vice Chair
Representing LSCB(s)  NTLSCB and AILC
Discussion

A number of chairs have raised some important points that may benefit from further sharing of views and experiences.

These include ;

- Impact of Rapid Review requirement on current processes and therefore status of current arrangements (LSCB panels/decision making and commissioning)

- There are a number of positions being run up to the new national panel and we are starting to get responses, so it may be helpful to share these. 

- For example - Fitting in the rapid review (which is challenging for some in terms of timing) may not replace the need for the work that a panel does in accessing enough information to reach a determination and recommendation to the LSCB chair for her/his decision. In one instance a board has complied with the RR timeline and requirement but indicated to the national panel that this had not on this occasion provided sufficient information to meet with current requirements for the chair to make his decision. It appears that the NP has accepted this given that the feedback re RR to the NP provided sufficient information and rationale.

Another chair and board are trialling there existing process i,e SI notification triggering a panel and call for info as the RR with the proviso that this is unlikely to meet the 15 day requirement, and that the outcome may be as above or result in a chairs decision. This has yet to be submitted to the NP so feedback is not yet available

Another concern has been whether in making their decisions chairs should use the new WT - Closer examination however reveals Page 5 of the transitional guidance ( footnote 2)  states quite clearly that while LSCBs continue to exist they should continue to refer to WT 15  chapters 3 , 4 ( disregarding references to notifiable incidents and the national panel , and chapter 5.

 

 

0 replies
Posted August 13, 2018 by Sarah Webb
   Click into the boxes below to create your post  
Name of Author  Sarah Webb
Job Title
 AILC Policy Adviser
Representing LSCB(s)  National policy adviser
Discussion

Have any partnerships started to consider/decided anything regarding their MASA funding? 

This is a topical issue -if your area has even started this discussion, please do share any information here so that it's helpful to all members.

 

Contact Details

(should you like people to be able to contact you directly to discuss your post &/or attachments; if any)

 policy@lscbchairs.org.uk
0 replies